![]() ![]() This can be seen as a major causal factor in the Saracens salary-cap scandal and the disbandment of Exeter’s England contingent. However, for teams who find a “golden generation” coming through their academy at the same time, this poses a significant challenge. If a club have one or two England players, the financial hit can be absorbed within the cap. The more you develop yourself, the more you get penalised from a cap point of view.” “There’s lots of intangible benefits to producing England players but it costs you competitive money within the cap to have a large number of England players in your squad. “The way the system is set up, it is not financially sensible or viable for clubs to produce English players. “Purely from an economic point of view, it is counterintuitive to produce players for England, lose them and not be able to replace them within the cap,” one club executive said. There is also a maximum cap of £600,000 in the home-grown credits and £400,000 for EPS players so the more England players a club provide, the less money they have to replace them Meanwhile, they continue to pay £270,000 for an international who may play only 10 or 12 games a season. As they will miss at least half the league fixtures through Tests and mandatory rest periods, the club will have to budget for a replacement but will have only an extra £30,000 in cap relief to do that. Let us say the average England international is paid £300,000 by their club. It leads to a perverse situation where Northampton Saints, for example, will receive as much credit for Fraser Dingwall, an EPS member unused by England, as they did for Lewis Ludlam, who played in every Six Nations match this year. This means if a home-grown player plays in every England Test over a season, the club will be compensated only £30,000 for their absence. However, the maximum credit a club can claim for a single player is £80,000. These should all act as incentives for clubs to produce as many England internationals as possible. Clubs then receive an additional £5,000 for every England match they play in. On top of the baseline £5 million cap, clubs receive £50,000 for every home-grown player in their squad and an additional £40,000 for every player provided to England’s Elite Player Squad. This is because of several flaws in the salary-cap system. “You kind of get caught in between in that zone. is not appealing to clubs at the moment because you are away for half the season and don’t really get the financial benefits for it,” Willis, who signed for Toulouse after Wasps went bust, said. In practice, as Jack Willis recently referenced, England internationals are far from the attractive proposition that they should be. So what are the key issues? Do not grow EnglishĬlubs being incentivised to produce as many England internationals as possible is at the very heart of the Professional Game Agreement between the Rugby Football Union and Premiership Rugby. If the ultimate goal is to produce a sustainable league that provides a successful England team and Premiership clubs challenging in Europe then, on recent evidence, it is failing. ![]() A system designed to control costs has an in-built inflationary mechanism while two clubs have gone to the wall this season. The salary cap, as one prominent chief executive says, is “riddled with contradictions”.Ī system designed to produce England internationals punishes clubs who produce too many. The word comes up time and again in conversations with leading figures in English rugby. If there is one word that sums up the Premiership Rugby salary cap, it is “counterintuitive”. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |